Key result
Synchronized diaphragmatic stimulation improves LV systolic function when timed to early ventricular contraction.
Why the study?
Pharmacological conditioning of the phrenic nerve and diaphragm activation can improve systolic performance and ventilatory function, but the effect of pacing-induced diaphragmatic stimulation on LV systolic function was not established.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support adjunctive diaphragmatic pacing for LV optimization; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized validation before clinical use.
AIMS: Pharmacological conditioning of the phrenic nerve can positively influence systolic performance, and diaphragm activation improves ventilatory function. Here we investigate whether pacing-induced diaphragmatic stimulation (PIDS) may improve left ventricular (LV) systolic function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied a total of 35 patients (4 females, mean age 67 +/- 9 years, ejection fraction 61 +/- 14%) within 7 days following open heart surgery. The haemodynamic impact of different PIDS and ventricular pacing configurations and coupling intervals was tested in 132 episodes. Success of PIDS was assessed using fluoroscopy and palpation. Left ventricular systolic performance was recorded using the electromechanical activation time (EMAT) obtained through acoustic cardiography. Eighteen subjects were tested in the catheter laboratory and 17 in the intensive care unit. For both groups, EMAT significantly improved when the diaphragm was stimulated 20 ms after the onset of ventricular pacing. In all instances, PIDS could be induced with or without causing patient symptoms, and LV systolic performance improvement was comparable in symptomatic and asymptomatic modes. No desensitization of the diaphragm was observed following PIDS delivery 4-6 and 24 h following open heart surgery. CONCLUSION: Pacing-induced diaphragmatic stimulation, if synchronized to the onset of ventricular contraction with a fixed, non-zero coupling delay, can improve LV systolic function reproducibly for at least 1 h without causing patient symptoms. The absence of diaphragm desensitization further underscores the potential of PIDS as a practical therapeutic approach in device-based heart failure management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roos et al. (2008) studied Post-open heart surgery (n=35). Pacing-induced diaphragmatic stimulation (PIDS) vs. Baseline / Unpaced diaphragm was evaluated on Left ventricular systolic performance measured by electromechanical activation time (EMAT). Pacing-induced diaphragmatic stimulation, when synchronized to the onset of ventricular contraction with a 20 ms delay, significantly improved left ventricular systolic function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: