Key result
ICE-confirmed catheter contact during pulsed field ablation yields ~24% impedance drops, varying by pulmonary vein.
Why the study?
Impedance characteristics associated with directly visualized catheter contact during pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation have not been well characterized.
What are the characteristics of impedance changes during intracardiac echocardiography-confirmed catheter contact across different pulmonary veins and catheter configurations in pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=30)
What are the characteristics of impedance changes during intracardiac echocardiography-confirmed catheter contact across different pulmonary veins and catheter configurations in pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation?
This study provides device-specific reference data on impedance changes during ICE-confirmed catheter contact in pulsed field ablation, which may help ensure adequate contact for effective energy delivery.
PURPOSE: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has become an established treatment modality for atrial fibrillation (AF). Adequate catheter-to-tissue contact is essential for effective energy delivery. However, impedance characteristics associated with directly visualized catheter contact during PFA have not been well characterized. We evaluated impedance changes measured by the Contact Index during intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-confirmed catheter contact. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 30 consecutive patients who underwent index PFA for AF using a pentaspline catheter under a novel impedance measurement system (EnSite X, Abbott). Impedance changes in each pulmonary vein (PV) using both basket and flower configurations were measured. Catheter-to-tissue contact was confirmed by ICE positioned within the left atrium, and impedance changes associated with ICE-confirmed catheter contact were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2400 impedance measurements were analyzed. Median impedance changes ranged from 22% to 25% across pulmonary veins. Linear mixed-effects analysis demonstrated that both pulmonary vein location (P < 0.001) and catheter configuration (P < 0.001) were independently associated with impedance change, whereas no significant interaction was observed between pulmonary vein location and catheter configuration (P = 0.084). CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes the distribution of impedance changes observed during ICE-confirmed catheter contact across different pulmonary veins and catheter configurations. These findings provide device-specific descriptive reference data for future prospective validation studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=30). Intracardiac echocardiography-confirmed catheter contact during pulsed field ablation was evaluated on Impedance changes in each pulmonary vein using both basket and flower configurations (p=<0.001). Impedance changes during ICE-confirmed catheter contact for pulsed field ablation ranged from 22% to 25%, varying significantly by pulmonary vein location and catheter configuration (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: