Key result
ICE-guided pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation was associated with lower arrhythmia recurrence (12.7% vs 22.3%) and lower reconnection rates (11.9% vs 59.2%) than ablation without ICE.
Why the study?
Catheter-tissue contact is critical for durable lesions during pulsed-field ablation of AF, but the impact of ICE guidance on target reconnection rates was unclear.
Does intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided confirmation of catheter-tissue contact during pulsed-field ablation reduce arrhythmia recurrence and reconnection rates in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=615)
Yes
Does intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided confirmation of catheter-tissue contact during pulsed-field ablation reduce arrhythmia recurrence and reconnection rates in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Using intracardiac echocardiography to confirm catheter-tissue contact during pulsed-field ablation significantly reduces arrhythmia recurrence and lesion reconnection rates in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Introduction Catheter-tissue contact is critical in creating durable lesions during pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare the reconnection rate of previously ablated targets utilizing PFA with vs without intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guidance for confirmation of tissue contact. Methods This multicenter prospective study included consecutive paroxysmal and persistent AF patients undergoing their first procedure using the PFA system. Patients were classified as group 1 if ICE was used for assessment of catheter-tissue-contact (n=329) or group 2 if ICE was not utilized to evaluate tissue-contact (n=286). All patients received isolation of PVs (PVI) and left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) at the index procedure. Additional ablations were performed only in the presence of spontaneous triggers or documentation that those triggers were responsible for arrhythmia either spontaneously or after isoproterenol challenge. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. At the end of the follow-up, arrhythmia recurrence was noted in 42 (12.7%) and 64 (22.3%) patients in group 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.002) (Figure 1). All 42 patients in group 1 and 54 (84%) patients in group 2 received repeat ablation. At the redo procedure, reconnection of previously ablated structures was detected in 5/42 (11.9%) and 32/54 (59.2%) patients in group 1 and 2 respectively (p<0.001). ‘Ablation without ICE guided catheter-tissue contact assessment’ was found to be an independent predictor of reconnection (OR =6.001, 95% CI 2.761 – 15.991, p- value = <0.001) as well as recurrence (OR: 1.221, 95% CI 1.001 - 1.971, p=0.021). Conclusion ICE-guided PFA with confirmed catheter-tissue contact was associated with better success rate and significantly lower reconnection rate following ablation for AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohanty et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in atrial fibrillation (n=615). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided pulsed-field ablation vs. Pulsed-field ablation without ICE guidance was evaluated on reconnection of previously ablated structures at redo procedure (OR 6.001, 95% CI 2.761-15.991, p=<0.001). ICE-guided pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation was associated with lower arrhythmia recurrence (12.7% vs 22.3%) and lower reconnection rates (11.9% vs 59.2%) than ablation without ICE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: