Key result
Subclinical congestion on bioimpedance analysis linked to ~9.4-fold higher risk of mortality or worsening HF.
Why the study?
The role of bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting subclinical congestion in outpatients with HFrEF remains to be explored.
Does BIA-detected subclinical congestion predict an increased risk of worsening heart failure and all-cause mortality in outpatients with HFrEF?
Cohort (n=83)
Single-blind
No
Does BIA-detected subclinical congestion predict an increased risk of worsening heart failure and all-cause mortality in outpatients with HFrEF?
Hazard Ratio: 9.4 (95% CI 1.04–85.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 32% vs 4%
p-value: p=0.046
Whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis effectively identifies subclinical congestion in HFrEF outpatients, revealing it is highly prevalent and independently predicts a markedly increased risk of worsening heart failure and death.
May warrant closer monitoring in HFrEF outpatients; hypothesis-generating for BIA-guided trials before practice change.
Background Persistent congestion in heart failure (HF) carries a dismal prognosis. Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) non-invasively identifies extracellular water (ECW) redistribution associated with acute HF. However, its role in detecting subclinical congestion in HF outpatients still needs to be explored. Methods Eighty-three adult outpatients with HFrEF were recruited for a single-center prospective study. Segmental multi-frequency BIA was used to assess body composition and the extracellular-to-total body water ratio (ECW/TBW), a marker of fluid redistribution. Subclinical congestion was defined as ECW/TBWz‑score > 2 without clinical signs of congestion. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and worsening HF (WHF) events. Results In this cohort, 57% of patients had subclinical congestion. Higher congestion grades were associated with age, female sex, and comorbidities. ECW/TBWz‑score correlated linearly with NT-proBNP levels and low muscular indexes were associated with congestion severity. During a median follow-up of 10 months, 27% of patients experienced the primary outcome, mostly WHF events. Both subclinical and clinical congestion were independently associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome, with hazard ratios (HR) of 9.4 (1.04–85.1; p = 0.046) and 17 (1.11–261; p = 0.042), respectively. NT-proBNP and ECW/TBWz‑score showed similar power in predicting the outcome. Conclusions BIA detects subclinical congestion—a condition highly prevalent in outpatients with HFrEF. An increased ECW/TBW ratio correlates with established markers of congestion and is associated with adverse events in this population. These findings support the integration of BIA into routine HF care; however, further studies are needed to establish the clinical benefits of BIA-guided management and its impact on patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bragança et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) (n=83). Subclinical congestion (ECW/TBW z-score > 2 without clinical signs) vs. Euvolemic status (ECW/TBW z-score ≤ 2 without clinical signs) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and worsening HF events (hospitalisation, unplanned visits, or diuretic uptitration) (HR 9.4, 95% CI 1.04-85.1, p=0.046). Subclinical congestion detected by whole-body bioelectrical impedance analysis was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality or worsening heart failure (HR 9.4, p=0.046).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: