Key result
Hostile content in verbal productions and dreams is quantitatively linked to higher blood pressure.
Why the study?
Quantitative associations between blood pressure and hostile content in verbal productions and hypnotic dreams in hypertensive patients remain unclear regarding causality and underlying factors.
Observational
May link inhibited hostility to hypertension; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Quantitative associations can be demonstrated between blood pressure and measurements of hostile content in samples of verbal productions and hypnotic dreams. In comparisons between hypertensive and normotensive groups, and within hypertensive individuals at different times, these tend to support the hypothesis that essential hypertension accompanies inhibited, and only partially expressed, hostile aggressive impulses. However, these experiments do not discount the possibility that the hostile verbal content might be due to elevation of blood pressure, rather than vice versa, or that both might be dependent variables to some other critical factor. Furthermore, the collection of verbal samples by a stranger can be added to the list of stimuli that provoke a rise in blood pressure in hypertensive subjects; the same stimulus situation does not elicit an increase in the blood pressure of nonhypertensive subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaplan et al. (1961) conducted an observational in Essential hypertension. Hostile content in verbal productions and hypnotic dreams vs. Normotensive subjects was evaluated on Blood pressure. Measurements of hostile content in verbal productions and hypnotic dreams were quantitatively associated with blood pressure, suggesting hypertension accompanies inhibited hostile impulses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: