The growing demand for efficient and cost-effective nonlinear optical (NLO) materials has led to the exploration of nature-derived compounds and their potential applications in photonic devices. Naturally occurring curcuminoids are of particular interest due to their conjugated structures and biocompatibility. Among them, cyclocurcumin possesses a distinctive conjugated structure and electronic characteristics, making it an attractive candidate for NLO studies. In this work, ab initio- based density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to determine the electronic and optical properties of cyclocurcumin. These properties were systematically compared with other curcuminoids using the CAM-B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) computational approach. The NLO properties, including first ( \(\:β\:\) ) and second ( \(\:γ\:\) ) hyperpolarizabilities were examined under static and dynamic conditions (at wavelength ~ 632.8 nm). Computational results demonstrate that cyclocurcumin exhibits promising NLO responses in different solvent phases. In the static gas-phase \(\:β\:\) and \(\:γ\:\) of cyclocurcumin were calculated to be ~ \(\:\:33.709\) \(\:×\:\:{10}⁻³⁰\) e.s.u. and \(\:~\:91.436×\:\) \(\:{10}⁻³⁶\) e.s.u., respectively. The static gas phase \(\:β\:\) value is comparatively higher than those calculated for curcumin, demethoxycurcumin and bisdemethoxycurcumin. The frequency-dependent hyperpolarizability of cyclocurcumin are comparable to all the other curcuminoids. This study also shows that cyclocurcumin exhibits higher hyperpolarizability than the standard NLO material, urea ( \(\:β\:\:~\:0.367×\:\:{10}⁻³⁰\:\) e.s.u. and \(\:γ\:\) ~ 2.632 \(\:×\:\) 10 − 36 e.s.u.), in the static gas phase. In addition, theoretical absorption and Raman spectroscopic studies corroborate well with the NLO properties of curcuminoids. All these computational results confirm that cyclocurcumin is a promising computational NLO material candidate, with further experimental studies might pave the way for the photonics applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramesh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: