Reliable 3-hourly precipitation information is difficult to obtain in complex terrain because available products differ in spatial detail, temporal continuity, and bias. We develop Fusion-Mamba, a delayed-mode, station-calibrated multi-source fusion framework for regional hydroclimate assessment in Qinghai Province. The model is trained with gauge observations and, at inference, uses grid-available precipitation products, reanalysis fields, terrain attributes, and time factors to generate estimates on a 0.01° output grid. It combines point- and neighbourhood-scale representations, temporal modelling, and station-wise affine calibration. On the chronological test evaluation at 52 stations, Fusion-Mamba achieved CC = 0.8313, RMSE = 0.493 mm/3 h, MAE = 0.058 mm/3 h, and RB = 0.0275. It delivered the strongest pooled performance among five baseline models, although its comparison with the closest baseline was metric dependent. A separate station-disjoint experiment indicated metric-dependent transfer of the common neural backbone. In an additional production-consistent evaluation, five held-out stations were treated as ungauged target locations. Their predictions used the four nearest training stations and normalized inverse-distance-squared blending, yielding CC = 0.8254, RMSE = 0.3677 mm/3 h, MAE = 0.0538 mm/3 h, and RB = − 0.0215 across 210,040 samples. Heavy-rain results ( N = 234 ) require caution. The framework is not intended for near-real-time delivery, and latency depends on the slowest input plus preprocessing and quality control. The production-consistent test directly validates the blending rule at independent station locations, but broader station and operational validation remains necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: