Visual information in conversational recommendation interfaces can function as decision evidence, but its value may depend on decision role. We tested this in a 2 × 3 between-subjects experiment with 210 participants, crossing self versus proxy decisions with product-only, home-context, and home context with an older-user cue. Trust showed a role-contingent reversal: home context produced the highest mean for self decisions, whereas the older-user cue produced the highest mean for proxy decisions. The Role × Visual interaction remained significant after Holm correction. Decision confidence showed a visual-presentation main effect but no role interaction. Appraisal analyses indicated two selective pathways. Contextual presentation was associated with recommendation verifiability, with supported indirect associations for trust and confidence. The older-user cue showed a role-contingent association through target-user suitability, driven by a negative self-decision pathway. These findings support a role–representation fit account and suggest aligning visual evidence with the decision task and represented user.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: