Sand extraction and the disposal of stone industry fines are pressing environmental burdens. Marble slurry powder and crushed stone dust have each been studied separately, but a coupled evaluation of the two wastes, with a quantitative synergy assessment and a multicriteria selection framework, has been missing. An 11-mix programme, varying marble slurry powder (0, 10% and 20% by mass of cement) and crushed stone dust (0%–100% replacement of sand) in nominal 1:2:4 concrete, is converted into a performance envelope. Fresh, mechanical and water transport properties were normalised against the control and combined through a multicriteria performance index. Among the mixes with complete data, 10% marble powder with 50% crushed stone dust gave the best balance: 28-day compressive strength reached 26.1 MPa, about 23% above the control, and the 7-day water permeability coefficient fell about 2.6-fold, an early-age indication requiring later confirmation. A synergy index is suggestive of a positive interaction, though not statistically confirmed, whereas 20% marble powder is not beneficial. The behaviour suggests a physical filler, packing and pore refinement mechanism rather than a pozzolanic reaction. Diverting both wastes into concrete offers strength, early-age permeability and resource substitution benefits for the material sources studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanif et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: