A graphical abstract describes a concise, visual summary of a research paper's main findings. It presents the climate change and study methodology, hydro-climatic extremes and impacts, current adaptation responses and limitations, and recommendations/ way forward for climate-resilient WASH systems in Nepal. Climate change is intensifying hydro-climatic extremes across Nepal, triggering risks to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) systems. This study analyzed historical climate records (1994–2024) with global climate models (GCMs) under moderate and worst-case scenarios, complemented by a questionnaire survey across three physiographic regions of Nepal. Historical trends reveal longer dry spells, fewer wet spells, declining precipitation, rising temperatures, and increasing climate extremes; these resonate with water source depletion/drying up, quality deterioration, and unreliable WASH services. Future projections indicate intensification of these trends; in worst-case scenario, Siwalik/hill experiencing severe precipitation extremes: five-day precipitation projected to increase by 1.87 mm/year, heavy-precipitation days by 0.56 days/year, and annual precipitation by 22.27 mm/year, intensifying floods and landslides. High-mountain facing accelerated warming (TXx: + 0.07 °C/year and TXn: + 0.10 °C/year), threatening snowmelt-dependent water sources, while middle-mountain shows moderate but continued increases across both climate extremes. Although communities have practiced adaptations, mainly water source conservation-protection, wastewater reuse, rainwater harvesting, among others, they remain fragmented and insufficient against projected risks. Three pathways reveal linkages between climate extremes and WASH impacts, with some policy-practice gaps. The study recommends embedding climate extremes into WASH planning, developing climate-resilient infrastructure, integrated and inclusive adaptation strategies, and strengthening stakeholders' capacity to build resilient WASH systems in Nepal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: