Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Although IKZF1 deletion ( IKZF1 del ) confers a higher risk of relapse in childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), it is uncertain whether treatment intensification will reverse this risk and improve outcomes. The Malaysia-Singapore ALL 2010 study (MS2010) prospectively upgraded the risk assignment of patients with IKZF1 del to the next highest level and added imatinib to the treatment of all patients with BCR- ABL1 fusion. Patients and Methods In total, 823 patients with B-ALL treated in the Malyasia-Singapore ALL 2003 study (MS2003; n = 507) and MS2010 (n = 316) were screened for IKZF1 del using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay. The impact of IKZF1 del on the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was compared between the two studies. Results Patient characteristics were similar in both cohorts, including IKZF1 del frequencies (59 of 410 [14.4%] v 50 of 275 [18.2%]; P = .2). In MS2003, where IKZF1 del was not used in risk assignment, IKZF1 del conferred a significantly higher 5-year CIR (30.4% v 8.1%; P = 8.7 × 10 −7 ), particularly in the intermediate-risk group who lacked high-risk features (25.0% v 7.5%; P = .01). For patients with BCR-ABL1–negative disease, IKZF1 del conferred a higher 5-year CIR (20.5% v 8.0%; P = .01). In MS2010, the 5-year CIR of patients with IKZF1 del significantly decreased to 13.5% ( P = .05) and no longer showed a significant difference in patients with BCR-ABL1-negative disease (11.4% v 4.4%; P = .09). The 5-year overall survival for patients with IKZF1 del improved from 69.6% in MS2003 to 91.6% in MS2010 ( P = .007). Conclusion Intensifying therapy for childhood B-ALL with IKZF1 del significantly reduced the risk of relapse and improved overall survival. Incorporating IKZF1 del screening significantly improved treatment outcomes in contemporary ALL therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeoh et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: