Key result
Twice-daily apixaban achieves similar adherence to once-daily rivaroxaban in non-valvular AF.
Why the study?
Low adherence to cardiovascular medications is difficult to monitor and is associated with adverse outcomes, motivating comparison of adherence between apixaban and rivaroxaban in AF patients.
Cohort (n=350)
Absolute Event Rate: 97% vs 96%
p-value: p=0.43
Similar adherence despite dosing differences should not change practice; leaves open regimen effects on persistence in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Low adherence to cardiovascular medications is often difficult to monitor and is associated with adverse outcomes. We investigated whether there is a difference between the estimated adherence (EA) of the two-dosed regimens of apixaban (A) and the one-dosed regimen of rivaroxaban (R) for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This is a retrospective cohort study of AF patients referred to a well-structured nurse-based AF unit for the initiation of anticoagulation therapy. The adherence data was extracted from the Swedish national prescribed drug register. EA was calculated by dividing the number of daily doses dispensed from the prescription that occurred closest after 3 months from the first dispensed prescription of the respective agent until (but excluding) the last refill by the number of days in the interval. The study included 123 patients on A and 227 patients on R with a 12-month follow-up period. There were no significant demographic differences between the two patient groups except for previous vitamin K antagonist treatment, in the A patient group (n = 29, 24%) and in the R (n = 31, 14%), p = 0.025. The mean ± SD of EA after 3 months was high for both A 97 ± 7 (n = 112) and R 97 ± 9 (n = 197) p = 0.97. The EA ≥ 80% was for A 97% (n = 109) and for R 96% (n = 189) p = 0.43. The two dosed regimens of apixaban and the one dosed regimen of rivaroxaban showed similar high estimated adherence when administered for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF in a well-structured nurse-based AF clinic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Khalili et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=350). Apixaban vs. Rivaroxaban was evaluated on Estimated adherence (EA) ≥ 80% (p=0.43). A two-dose regimen of apixaban and a one-dose regimen of rivaroxaban showed similarly high estimated adherence rates ≥80% (97% vs 96%, p=0.43) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: