Key result
Head-up tilt resulted in significantly less high-frequency power than low-dose isoproterenol (172 vs 307 ms2; P<0.05) despite similar RR intervals.
Why the study?
The autonomic effects of head-up tilt and isoproterenol infusion, which alter autonomic balance by different mechanisms but produce the same RR intervals, were not fully characterized.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Autonomic testing with tilt versus isoproterenol may yield non-equivalent parasympathetic measures; leaves open optimal protocol standardization.
The objective of this study was to characterize the autonomic effects of 2 interventions, head-up tilt and isoproterenol infusion, which alter autonomic balance by different mechanisms but produce the same RR intervals. We compared the effect of head-up tilt with the effect of isoproterenol on autonomic balance as measured by power spectral analysis of RR variability. Fifteen normal subjects had baseline measurements and then underwent head-up tilt. After return to baseline supine values, isoproterenol was infused at a rate of 1 microgram/min (low-dose isoproterenol), which was then increased to 2.1 +/- 0.5 microgram/min (high-dose isoproterenol). All subjects underwent a second tilt during high-dose isoproterenol, and 9 subjects completed this second tilt study. During the experiment, normal RR intervals were recorded and 5-minute segments were used to calculate power spectra. High-frequency (HF) power (0.15 to 0.40 Hz) was used as a measure of vagal activity. The effects of head-up tilt were compared with the effects of low-dose isoproterenol. Despite nearly identical mean RR intervals (784 ms with tilt vs 792 ms with low-dose isoproterenol, p = NS), there was significantly (p < 0.05) less HF power during head-up tilt in the drug-free state (172 ms2) than during low-dose isoproterenol in the supine position (307 ms2). A second head-up tilt was performed during the infusion of high-dose isoproterenol. During high-dose isoproterenol, tilt caused a decrease in RR intervals (from 573 to 491 ms; p < 0.01) and a decrease in HF power (from 68 to 28 ms2; p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bloomfield et al. (1995) studied this question. Head-up tilt vs. Low-dose isoproterenol (1 microgram/min) was evaluated on High-frequency (HF) power (p=<0.05). Head-up tilt resulted in significantly less high-frequency power than low-dose isoproterenol (172 vs 307 ms2; P<0.05) despite similar RR intervals.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: