Key result
Dynamic troponin changes are not associated with myocardial infarction in acute ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Elevated hs-cTn values are common in acute ischemic stroke patients and associated with poor prognosis, but diagnostic and therapeutic implications remain unclear.
Does a dynamic change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin values identify myocardial infarction in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Cross-Sectional (n=254)
Blinded end-point assessment
Yes
Does a dynamic change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin values identify myocardial infarction in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Odds Ratio: 1.05 (95% CI 0.31–3.33)
Absolute Event Rate: 32% vs 38%
p-value: p=.30
In patients with acute ischemic stroke and elevated troponin, a dynamic change in troponin does not reliably identify myocardial infarction, whereas very high baseline absolute troponin levels (5-10x ULN) are predictive of type 1 MI.
Troponin dynamics should not guide MI diagnosis in acute ischemic stroke; leaves open optimal biomarker interpretation and requires prospective validation.
Importance: Elevated values of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) are common in patients with acute ischemic stroke and are associated with poor prognosis. However, diagnostic and therapeutic implications in patients with ischemic stroke remain unclear. Objective: To identify factors indicative of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with acute ischemic stroke and hs-cTn elevation. The primary hypothesis was that a dynamic change of hs-cTn values (>50% change) in patients with acute ischemic stroke indicates MI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was a prospective, observational study with blinded end-point assessment conducted across 26 sites in Germany. Patients were included if they had acute ischemic stroke within 72 hours and either (1) highly elevated hs-cTn values on admission (>52 ng/L) or (2) hs-cTn levels above the upper limit of normal and a greater than 20% change at repeated measurements. Patients were enrolled between August 2018 and October 2020 and had 1 year of follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed between April 2022 and August 2023. Exposure: Standardized electrocardiography, echocardiography, and coronary angiography. Main Outcome and Measures: Diagnosis of MI as adjudicated by an independent end-point committee based on the findings of electrocardiography, echocardiography, and coronary angiography. Results: In total, 254 patients were included. End points were adjudicated in 247 patients (median [IQR] age, 75 [66-82] years; 117 were female [47%] and 130 male [53%]). MI was present in 126 of 247 patients (51%) and classified as type 1 MI in 50 patients (20%). Dynamic change in hs-cTn value was not associated with MI in univariable (32% vs 38%; χ2 P = .30) or adjusted comparison (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.31-3.33). The baseline absolute hs-cTn value was independently associated with type 1 MI. The best cutoffs for predicting type 1 MI were at hs-cTn values 5 to 10 times the upper limit normal. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that in patients with acute ischemic stroke, a dynamic change in hs-cTn values did not identify MI, underscoring that dynamic changes do not identify the underlying pathophysiological mechanism. In exploratory analyses, very high absolute hs-cTn values were associated with a diagnosis of type 1 MI. Further studies are needed how to best identify patients with stroke who should undergo coronary angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nolte et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute ischemic stroke with elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (n=254). Dynamic change of hs-cTn values (>50% change) vs. No dynamic change in hs-cTn values was evaluated on Diagnosis of myocardial infarction (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.31-3.33, p=.30). In patients with acute ischemic stroke and elevated troponin, a dynamic change in troponin values was not associated with a diagnosis of myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 1.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: