This study examines whether salience theory explains stock returns in the Korean market from 2005 to 2024. We find a robust negative relationship between the salience of past returns (ST) and future stock returns. A long-short portfolio sorting on ST generates a significant four-factor alpha of −1.50% per month (t-stat = −5.91). We show that the effect is almost entirely driven by the trading of individual investors; the ST effect is pronounced in stocks heavily purchased by retail investors but is absent in stocks favored by institutions. Also, the ST-return relation is significantly stronger during periods of market-wide short-sale bans and for stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility. Finally, this relation is pronounced under low sentiment or high uncertainty states. Our results extend the salience-based asset pricing literature beyond developed markets and suggest that behavioral biases may be amplified in emerging market contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: