Urea is a vital nitrogen fertilizer for global food security; however, its production remains carbon-intensive owing to heavy reliance on fossil fuel–based H 2 . To reduce the carbon emissions of the urea production process, capturing CO 2 from the flue gas has emerged as a promising strategy. However, this strategy faces several critical limitations. First, the captured CO 2 from flue gas undergoes incomplete conversion into urea, causing inherent carbon losses. Second, conventional air combustion requires substantial fuel consumption, leading to thermodynamic inefficiencies. Finally, absorption-based capture approach causes high thermal energy penalties. To address these issues, this study proposes hybrid urea production processes that introduce solid oxide electrolysis and utilize oxy-fuel combustion within the natural gas-based process. CO 2 F, fully utilizing internally captured CO 2 , and CO 2 E, supplementing external CO 2 , were compared with the base case employing amine-based absorption with partial utilization of the captured CO 2 . The proposed processes maximized the carbon valorization efficiency, reduced fuel consumption, eliminated high thermal energy consumption for solvent regeneration, and achieved high CO 2 capture rates. CO 2 F and CO 2 E achieved a levelized cost of urea as 409.7 $/t Urea and 440.3 $/t Urea , lower than 468.4 $/t Urea for the base case. CO 2 E demonstrated superior environmental performance, achieving a global warming potential of 348.8–462.8 g CO2-eq. /kg Urea , including process direct, indirect and upstream emissions. Notably, under the broader greenhouse gas emission boundary, CO 2 E achieved a higher probability of being economically feasible under variable carbon taxes, credits, and electricity prices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: