Enroute air traffic controllers (ATCOs) face two fundamentally distinct yet interrelated operational tasks: macroscopic flow-level planning and flight level assignment for sector-wide traffic optimization over time horizons on the order of tens of minutes and microscopic real-time conflict detection and resolution (CD&R) between individual aircraft pairs. These tasks operate across heterogeneous spatial and temporal scales, resulting in high dimensionality and strong cross-level coupling that complicate automation design and human–autonomy collaboration. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a Sequential–Hierarchical Coordination (SHC) framework that explicitly bridges macroscopic and microscopic decision layers through a spatiotemporal constraint propagation mechanism. Within this architecture, a Sequential Composition Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (SCHRL) algorithm is developed. At the high level, an enhanced multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient (MADDPG) algorithm with invalid-action masking is employed for flight profile (i.e., flight level) optimization. At the low level, a soft actor–critic (SAC) algorithm augmented with a priority-based coordination mechanism is designed to handle real-time conflict resolution. To mitigate trust issue commonly associated with black-box learning-based systems, the proposed framework further integrates expert imitation learning and a dynamic intervention response module, enabling closer behavioral alignment between automated decision-making and ATCO operational practices. Simulation experiments using real-world operational data and high-density traffic conditions show that the proposed framework achieves a 97.6% completion rate for control tasks across the tested scenarios, while reducing ATCO temporal decision costs by more than 34% under ultra-high traffic demand. These findings demonstrate robustness, scalability, and practical promise of the SHC framework for human–autonomy collaborative air traffic control in complex enroute environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: