O'Neal, EK, Knight, SN, Bowling, LR, Scudamore, EM, Scudamore, V, and Waldman, HS. Running economy assessment at 90% of 5-km pace is more informative than lower intensities among women's NCAA Division I cross-country competitors. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) women's cross-country (XC) runners compete at distances of 5-6 km producing respiratory exchange ratios (RER) > 0.99 at race pace. This prevents calculation of the most sensitive unit of running economy (RE) metabolic cost (MC). This study first established the steady-state characteristics of V̇o2 and RER using 60-s sampling intervals during the last 2-minute of 5-minute RE bouts at individual 5-km race pace (5RP) and 70, 80, and 90% 5RP of 13 NCAA Division I Women's XC runners. After confirming steady state was not compromised by intensity, the relationship of V̇o2 and RER between 100% 5RP and submaximal paces were explored. Min-4 and min-5 Cohen's d effect sizes were <0.07 for V̇o2 at all submaximal velocities, and RER at lowest (70%; d = 0.25) and highest (90%; d = 0.29) intensities were similar. Strong relationships (r ≥ 0.89; p < 0.001) between V̇o2 for 70, 80, and 90% to 5RP were exhibited. However, RER for 70% (r = -0.10) and 80% (r = -0.12) both produced inverse, nonsignificant relationships to 5RP. By contrast, 90% produced an r = 0.62 (p = 0.03), and no runner's RER exceeded 0.99. For performance analysts and NCAA Women's XC coaches using RE to detect training intervention efficacy, metabolic steady state is (a) uncompromised at 90% of 5RP, (b) permits MC calculation, and (c) better reflects 5RP metabolic profile than lower intensities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Neal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: