This study proposes an Interval Type-3 Fuzzy Logic Controller (IT3-FLC) integrated with an Active Tuned Mass Damper (ATMD) for seismic vibration mitigation in an eleven-story high-rise building. The building–ATMD system is formulated in state-space form, while the fuzzy-controller parameters and ATMD mechanical properties are jointly optimized using the Observer–Teacher–Learner-Based Optimization (OTLBO) algorithm. Four earthquake records—El Centro, Hachinohe, Kobe, and Northridge—are used simultaneously in the multi-record optimization to obtain a single fixed controller design without record-specific retuning. The optimized Type-1, Type-2, and Type-3 fuzzy controllers are compared with a passive TMD and a conventional Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) using normalized peak and RMS response indices, energy-based measures, and frequency-domain assessments. A hard actuator-force saturation constraint is also incorporated, while stroke, relative velocity, and mechanical power demands are evaluated. To assess generalization, eight additional previously unseen ground motions, including four near-fault and four far-fault records, are used for out-of-sample validation with all controller parameters kept unchanged. The results show that the Type-3 FLC–ATMD generally provides favorable and balanced reductions, particularly in displacement- and velocity-related responses, and performs better than the lower-order fuzzy controllers in many cases. However, the relative ranking remains record- and metric-dependent, with LQR and the passive TMD outperforming Type-3 for some acceleration-, RMS-, spectral-, and energy-based measures. The additional validation confirms effective response mitigation under unseen seismic excitations without implying uniform superiority over all benchmark controllers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doroudi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: