Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-domain few-shot hyperspectral image classification is challenged by scarce target-domain annotations, sensor-induced domain shifts, and spectral abnormalities, including band loss, noise, and spectral misalignment. To address these issues, we propose a Group-aware Spectral Perturbation Consistency Network (G-SPCNet) and evaluate both Clean classification and Robust perturbation stability under a unified protocol. G-SPCNet divides the spectrum into contiguous band groups and employs lightweight convolutions and bidirectional spectral-context modeling to construct grouped class prototypes. During source-domain meta-training, contiguous band masking, random band dropout, noisy-band injection, and spectral-axis shifting are applied online to form clean and perturbed views. Classification and predictive-distribution consistency objectives improve global robustness, while group-level prediction consistency and clean-prototype anchoring stabilize local decisions and prototype structures. In five-way five-shot experiments using LongKou as the source domain and Indian Pines, PaviaU, Salinas, and Chikusei as target domains, G-SPCNet achieved average Clean OA/AA, Robust OA/AA, and Robust Kappa values of 87.02%, 79.47%, and 74.34%, respectively. It outperformed seven comparison methods in the main Robust evaluation and maintained the highest average OA among the five evaluated methods at all tested support-set sizes in the shot-sensitivity analysis and at all tested severity levels in the mixed perturbation analysis. With only 0.153 M parameters, G-SPCNet provides a lightweight accuracy–robustness trade-off for cross-domain hyperspectral image classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: