Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Organizations that actively listen to stakeholders often face the same public criticism as those that do not. This paradox highlights a core challenge: despite dedicating resources to organizational listening, practitioners must navigate a complex web of conflicting viewpoints both internally and externally. While existing literature emphasizes the theoretical importance of stakeholder voice in decision-making, empirical research on communication practitioners’ daily realities of organizational listening processes and practices remains scarce. Acknowledging this complexity, this study explores two primary questions: (1) What are the current processes and practices of organizational listening? and (2) How do practitioners negotiate competing organizational and stakeholder expectations? Through in-depth interviews with 28 public relations and communication practitioners in Australia, this research identifies several key dynamics. Findings highlight the tension between stakeholder- and organization-centric goals; the expansive responsibilities of practitioners from listening system design to feedback implementation; the relational skills required to bridge gaps; strategies for capturing diverse perspectives; and methods for evaluating listening effectiveness. Ultimately, these findings illuminate how practitioners manage the intricacies of organizational listening in pursuit of mutual understanding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: