Young adulthood is the peak of cognitive performance, yet there exist individual differences in learning, problem-solving, and decision-making abilities. We recorded eye movements and electrodermal activity (EDA) from 89 young adults performing dual n-back tasks to investigate whether psychophysiological signals can reveal these differences. Machine learning (ML) models reliably classified individuals with high versus low working memory capacity (WMC), with eye-tracking features (fixation duration, pupil diameter, saccadic velocity) emerging as dominant predictors and EDA providing complementary arousal-related cues. By extending permutation-based feature importance, we identified a minimal set of psychophysiological measures enabling robust classification across participants. Our subsequent counterfactual ablation of this psychophysiological metric set further revealed an asymmetry wherein low-WMC individuals could be reclassified as high-WMC through perturbations of gaze and arousal features, whereas high-WMC individuals remained resistant to such manipulation. This suggests high WMC may emerge as a stable trait, while low WMC may be enhanced via interventions. Together, these findings establish multimodal ML as a robust framework for quantifying WMC through physiological markers, namely eye and EDA metrics, and highlight promising pathways for enhancing the cognitive capacity of individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: