Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has recently gained attention as a technology that supports supply chain decision-making due to its unique natural language capabilities. In this context, it is seen as a top-layer augmentation to traditional analytical and optimisation-based technologies, accelerating decision support needed to keep businesses competitive. While extant literature largely discusses the conceptual potentials of GenAI, empirical evidence on its implications for human-AI collaboration and its boundaries with other AI technologies remains limited. Therefore, the present study adopts an abductive qualitative approach to explore GenAI-based decision-making through semi-structured interviews with experts. The empirical data were analysed using thematic analysis and subsequently interpreted through the lens of a recent AI decision-making framework. By theorising the empirical insights, this study clarifies GenAI’s current role as a cognitive decision-support layer rather than an autonomous decision-maker, along with its limitations. The findings contribute to the literature by providing empirical validation of GenAI as an augmentative technology and by offering evidence-based guidance on how organisations can responsibly leverage GenAI to enhance decision quality, operational efficiency, and operational resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qarqash et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: