Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with three treatment modalities for common displaced distal radius fractures (DRFs): (1) non-operative treatment, (2) direct plate fixation and (3) delayed plate fixation in case of fracture redisplacement during follow-up. METHODS: A cost and HRQoL analysis was performed based on data collected during the CAST study, a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial including adult patients with a displaced DRF, randomized between immobilization with a plaster splint or circumferential cast. Included patients were prospectively followed for one year. Operatively treated patients also continued questionnaire follow-up. From a societal perspective, healthcare costs, patient and family costs, and indirect (i.e. productivity) costs were collected. Patients completed questionnaires on HRQoL (EQ-5D-5 L), healthcare consumption and work productivity. RESULTS: In total, 693 patients were included in this study (non-operative: 402, direct plate fixation: 165, delayed plate fixation: 126). The estimated mean total costs per patient were €2,212 for non-operative treatment, €4,339 for direct plate fixation and €4,393 for delayed plate fixation HRQoL improved between 3 and 12 months but did not reach pre-injury HRQoL in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a descriptive overview of societal costs of displaced DRF treatment. Non-operative treatment is least costly. The cost differences between direct and delayed plate fixation is €58 in favor of direct plate fixation. Starting with non-operative treatment and later deciding whether to proceed with operative treatment based on alignment changes during follow-up, could reasonably be considered as a treatment option. HRQoL improved in all groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barvelink et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: