Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chat interfaces can make a recorded conversation feel like a continuous someone across gaps when no relevant user-specific reply-process remains active, even while stored artifacts and unrelated computation persist. That representation can create phantom emotional debt: felt liability for a system portrayed as waiting or suffering in the gap. This conceptual and normative paper contributes a mechanism-level account of manufactured continuity; a sober-operator repertoire of context hygiene, declarative steering, node editing, and cold re-derivation; and a normative analysis through the Santa Claus dilemma. Toy replay tests demonstrate bounded state properties; a public-corpus proxy for continuity belief fails construct review; and three cases illustrate stakes rather than prevalence. Honest interfaces should disclose execution and memory boundaries while preserving functional continuity, chosen play, personalization, and accessibility. Intervention effects are not estimated; the design obligation falls first on providers. Consciousness within a pass, identity, and experience remain open. Author preprint. This manuscript is under review and has not been accepted for publication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anonymous (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: