Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study developed and initially evaluated a 12-item Digital Well-Being Scale (DWBS) for Chinese university students. An initial 27-item pool was administered to 1526 undergraduates, and the cross-sectional dataset was randomly divided for item and exploratory factor analyses, network analysis and candidate-model evaluation. Expert review of the 12-item form yielded I-CVIs of 0.71–1.00, S-CVI/Ave = 0.89 and 84.52% agreement with prespecified content domains. The short form retained the original total-score information ( r = 0.992) and showed high internal consistency (α = 0.959). Exploratory factor and bifactor results supported a dominant general factor (ωH = 0.948; ECV = 0.885), while specific-factor reliability was weak. HTMT values ranged from 0.844 to 0.957, indicating limited domain distinctiveness. Network communities were consistent across tested tuning parameters, although weak edges were parameter-sensitive. The total score is currently recommended; domain scores should remain descriptive pending independent replication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: