Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We construct an effective carrier model within the Worldline–Residue–Resource–Action framework. Two conditionally independent registers encode prime-factor multiplicities. A label-symmetric equality projector controls a common source coupled to two supplied particle-pair channels. One pulse generates the earlier collision-statistic probabilities without address-dependent interaction strength. A restricted single-register obstruction and a classification of diagonal permutation-invariant effects specify the construction’s resource assumptions. The implementation reproduces species probabilities, but not the preceding interface’s coherent output channel. Bare-energy conservation holds at the calibrated reference volume; detuning away from resonance requires interaction energy and switching work. A response identity relates the reference pressure-volume moment to the logarithmic-volume derivative of mean pulse work. Composition with the implemented muon-decay kernel recovers energy and pressure histories at full conversion. This is an executable effective interaction candidate and compatibility analysis; lepton identities, weak interactions, and the full fifteen-channel carrier are not derived from arithmetic alone. Version 0.2, editorial revision of 9 October 2026. Includes the English manuscript, Korean guide, and reproducibility archive. The 123 carrier-level checks are internal consistency checks, not experimental validation or external journal peer review. The manuscript was prepared before this deposit; its preparation-time statement that no public DOI had been assigned is superseded by this record. Preceding WRRA records: r11, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23237629; particle interface v0.2, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23241511; dynamic decays v0.2, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23246308.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: