This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA-M) for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to identify clinically relevant diagnostic cutoff values. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study using registry data from Thai wheelchair users with SCI receiving outpatient rehabilitation care at a tertiary university hospital. Ultrasonographic CSA-M (index test) and electrodiagnostic studies (reference standard) were performed by blinded examiners. RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants were included, of whom 25(37.3%) had CTS. Among 126 wrists analyzed, 42(33.3%) had electrodiagnostically confirmed CTS. Mean CSA-M was significantly larger in CTS compared with non-CTS wrists (14.4±4.4 vs. 10.7±3.3 mm²; P<0.001). The AuROC was 0.76(95% CI, 0.67-0.84). At a 10 mm² cutoff sensitivity was 90.5%, and specificity was 45.2%. At 15 mm², sensitivity was 33.3%, and specificity was 91.7%. Age, sex, and body mass index did not influence diagnostic performance. The wrist-to-forearm ratio showed comparable, but not superior, diagnostic performance to CSA-M. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic CSA-M demonstrates moderate diagnostic accuracy for CTS in wheelchair users with SCI. Lower cutoffs favor screening sensitivity, whereas higher cutoffs improve diagnostic specificity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buntragulpoontawee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: