Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Slender steel frames are flexible and lightly damped, so dynamic actions such as earthquakes and wind can govern their response. Design codes such as ASCE 7 and Eurocode 8 permit the equivalent static (lateral force) procedure only for regular, short-period structures and require dynamic analysis otherwise. This study evaluates, experimentally and numerically, how effectively viscous dampers (VDs), a tuned mass damper (TMD) and their combination (TMD + VD) reduce the dynamic response of a laboratory-scale, four-storey, two-dimensional steel frame. The frame was tested on a uniaxial shaking table under a harmonic base excitation with a peak acceleration of 0.398 g in four configurations: bare frame, frame with VDs in the first two storeys, frame with a roof TMD and frame with both. The measured responses were then reproduced in SAP2000 using fast nonlinear analysis. Compared with the bare frame, the measured roof displacement decreased by 55.0%, 88.7% and 90.2%, and the peak inter-storey drift ratio by 48.4%, 89.4% and 88.5%, for the VD, TMD and TMD + VD configurations, respectively. The numerically computed peak base shear decreased by 84.2%, 89.8% and 97.0%. The numerical roof displacements were within 6.2% of the measured values. The TMD provided most of the reduction, while the added VDs further reduced the lower-storey drifts and the base shear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghaedi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: