This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study investigates the phase-transition behavior of indium-based catalysts under methanol-synthesis conditions and demonstrates that preforming strongly affects catalytic performance. In situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealed that In(OH)3 fully dehydrated to In2O3 at 275 °C under high methanol conversion conditions, while neat In2O3 remained stable. Supporting the hydroxide on ZrO2 significantly lowered its phase-transition temperature, bringing it below 200 °C. Rietveld refinement and phase quantification revealed the presence of small amounts of hydroxide under reaction conditions, indicating an In2O3–In(OH)3 dynamic equilibrium. Preforming the In(OH)3/ZrO2 with hydrogen revealed that the bulk hydroxide converts to the oxide at 125 °C. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated delayed water release starting at 150 °C. This suggests that oxygen vacancies can only form after water desorption. This is evident in catalytic testing, where preforming conditions significantly influence catalytic activity. Preforming with hydrogen above the phase-transition temperature resulted in a more active catalyst. The same trend was also confirmed with a Ni-doped catalyst, achieving a maximum methanol productivity of 0.49 gMeOH gcat h–1 at 300 °C and 75 bar with a gas mixture consisting of 50% N2, 12.5% CO2, and 37.5% H2. These findings reveal further potential of the indium-based methanol synthesis catalyst by improving catalyst pretreatment and better understanding the properties of catalyst phase transitions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herrmann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: