Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and ecological contribution of the Multiple Errands Test in a Professional Setting, a vocationally oriented executive function assessment, after traumatic brain injury (TBI), and explore its association with return to work (RTW). Setting: A Swiss neurorehabilitation center with an integrated vocational rehabilitation workshop. Participants: Fifty adults with TBI undergoing return-to-work rehabilitation and 40 control participants without brain lesions. Design: Single-center prospective psychometric study with retrospective use of previously collected data. Main Measures: Multiple Errands Test in a Professional Setting error scores, conventional executive and attentional tests, a clinic-adapted Multiple Errands Test, and RTW at 12 months. Results: Participants with TBI made significantly more rule-breaking, inefficiency, partial-realization, interpretation, and judgment errors than controls. Overall, 82% of participants with TBI failed at least one Multiple Errands Test in a Professional Setting measure, including more than 70% who succeeded on conventional executive or attentional assessments. Concordance with traditional assessment was statistically significant for total and attentional assessment but low. Multiple Errands Test in a Professional Setting performance had limited predictive value for RTW, whereas attentional impairment showed a stronger association with work status. Conclusion: Multiple Errands Test in a Professional Setting detects work-relevant executive difficulties often missed by standard tests and may support individualized vocational rehabilitation planning after TBI when interpreted within a broader clinical functional assessment framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wicki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: