Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Concepts of massive transfusion and transfusion-associated futility were largely established during the component therapy era. Increasing whole blood use may alter the relationship between transfusion burden and mortality. We characterized the continuous association between RBC-equivalent transfusion burden and in-hospital mortality in a contemporary national trauma cohort. Study Design: Adult trauma patients receiving ≥1 unit of packed red blood cells within 4 hours of admission were identified in American College of Surgeons TQIP from 2020 to 2023. RBC-equivalent transfusion burden was defined as packed red blood cells plus whole blood units administered within 4 hours. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable spline-based logistic regression modeled mortality across transfusion burden and identified the maximum mortality slope, 50% predicted mortality, and plateau onset. Results: Among 126,271 patients, 85,832 (68.0%) sustained blunt and 40,439 (32.0%) penetrating injury. Mortality increased nonlinearly with escalating RBC-equivalent transfusion burden. Maximum slope occurred at 21.1 units, the 95th percentile of transfusion burden. Predicted mortality reached 50% at 41.9 units, the 99th percentile, and plateau onset occurred at 55.3 units. Mortality did not approach 100% despite extreme transfusion requirements. Conclusions: In a contemporary national trauma cohort, mortality increased nonlinearly across RBC-equivalent transfusion burden, with distinct high-risk regions near 21, 42, and 55 units. These reference points may contextualize trajectories during active resuscitation while demonstrating that extreme transfusion requirements are not synonymous with universal mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: