Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) comprises distinct obsession dimensions rather than a unitary disorder, yet many unusual presentations remain unrecognized clinically. This case series evaluates three patients who exemplify rare OCD dimensions (superstition, taboo impulses, and transformation), identified from a sample of five consecutive clinical presentations. Dimensional mapping used factor-analytic and network-analytic frameworks derived from the dimensional yale-brown obsessive-compulsive scale (DY-BOCS). Case 1 illustrates superstition/magical-thinking OCD with poor insight; Case 2 shows taboo impulse obsessions misdiagnosed as psychosis; Case 3 demonstrates transformation/identity OCD in an adolescent gamer. Each case maps to under-recognized dimensions from contemporary eight-factor models. Dimensional assessment aids recognition of rare OCD presentations, prevents costly misdiagnosis (particularly psychotic misclassification), and guides mechanism-focused treatment. A dimensional approach is essential for clinical practice in tertiary care settings, particularly in Indian populations where certain dimensions may be culturally salient yet clinically overlooked.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: