Joint refill of cascade reservoirs must balance flood control safety against water conservation and hydropower generation, yet conventional operation applies fixed flood-limiting water levels that ignore the time-varying nature of flood risk within a flood season. Existing refill optimization models rarely embed flood season staging as time-varying operational constraints, which limits their ability to capture stage-dependent flood risk and refill opportunity, particularly in cascades headed by a large regulating reservoir. This study develops a framework that identifies flood season stages via the mean change-point method across multiple hydrological stations, transforms the stage boundaries into time-varying water-level constraints, and embeds them in a genetic algorithm-based joint refill optimization model for the Dadu River cascade in southwestern China. Applied to a 65-year inflow record, the framework consistently identifies early August as the main-to-post-flood transition and a secondary autumn flood rebound from mid-September to early October. Relative to the design scheme based on approved conventional operating rules and fixed flood-limiting water level controls, the optimized operation increases the multi-year average total generation of the five-station cascade by 10.08%, from 507.98 × 108 kWh to 559.16 × 108 kWh, while achieving a 100% filling rate at the leading Shuangjiangkou reservoir and maintaining acceptable flood storage during the post-flood period. By demonstrating that within-year inflow trend substantially modulates refill outcomes, especially when annual inflow volumes are comparable, the framework offers differentiated refill strategies and a transferable approach for cascade systems with newly commissioned leading reservoirs in monsoon-driven basins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: