Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: Suppurative corneal ulcers due to filamentous fungi are a serious and intractable problem in many tropical developing countries. In vitro studies and a small pilot study have shown that chlorhexidine gluconate is effective. The aim was to establish the optimum concentration which would be appropriate to use in a larger randomized clinical trial. METHODS: A masked randomized clinical trial of three concentrations of chlorhexidine compared with natamycin 5% was carried out in consecutive patients with established corneal ulcers shown by microscopy to contain fungal hyphae and later proven to be culture positive. Topical treatments were applied 1/2-hourly to 2-hourly for up to 5 days, with reduced frequency thereafter, and all patients were re-assessed at 21 days. RESULTS: Of 60 patients entered in the trial, 2 were lost to follow-up, and 12 were classified as 'severe' with little prospect of recovery. At 5 days the response was related to the concentration of chlorhexidine, with 0.2% giving the best results. Compared with the response to natamycin as the referent, the relative efficacy was 1.17 with chlorhexidine 0.05%, 1.43 with 0.1%, and 2.00 with 0.2%. The superiority of 0.2% chlorhexidine over natamycin was statistically significant (relative efficacy 2.20, p = 0.043) in patients not having had prior antifungal treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study justifies further trials of chlorhexidine as a primary treatment for fungal corneal ulcers in circumstances where specific antifungal agents are not available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: