Key result
Program adaptations linked to ~9-fold higher odds of completing community health worker-led coaching.
Why the study?
Limited evidence exists on the role of community health workers in addressing behavioral health needs within lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular disease risk reduction in rural communities.
Do targeted program adaptations improve the completion rates of behavioral health assessments and coaching in a CHW-led cardiovascular disease risk reduction program in rural communities?
Observational (n=5,559)
Yes
Do targeted program adaptations improve the completion rates of behavioral health assessments and coaching in a CHW-led cardiovascular disease risk reduction program in rural communities?
Odds Ratio: 8.99 (95% CI 4.51–17.93)
Absolute Event Rate: 40.6% vs 8.2%
p-value: p=<.001
Integrating behavioral health screening and coaching into community health worker-led lifestyle interventions is feasible and can achieve high completion rates with targeted, flexible program adaptations.
Adaptations were associated with higher coaching completion in rural CHW programs; supports feasibility but leaves open effects on cardiovascular outcomes.
Purpose and Objectives: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and disability in the US, with higher rates in rural areas. Although community health workers (CHWs) are effective in improving CVD outcomes, limited evidence exists on their role in addressing behavioral health needs within lifestyle change interventions. This evaluation assessed the feasibility of integrating behavioral health components focusing on psychologic distress, anxiety, and depression into the Colorado Heart Healthy Solutions program (CHHS) in rural communities by using 3 domains of the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. Intervention Approach: Beginning in 2018, behavioral health components were added to CHHS: assessments for stress, anxiety, and depression; connections with community-based behavioral health resources; and a health coaching intervention linking physical and mental health. Program adaptations that provided additional CHW training, lowered screening thresholds, and expanded intervention materials were implemented to address local determinants. Evaluation Methods: Reach, implementation, and maintenance were assessed by using completion rates of each behavioral health component from 2019 to 2023. Logistic regression within an interrupted time-series framework evaluated the effects of program adaptations on CHW delivery. Results: CHWs completed 8,077 visits with 5,559 participants in 7 rural communities. Completion rates during the first 10 months ranged from 78.6% to 87.5% for the behavioral health assessments; 51.9% completed the connections to care and 8.2% completed the coaching intervention. Program adaptations in 2019 significantly improved completion of the brief assessments and coaching intervention use (P < .001). Adaptations in 2022 increased intervention use (P < .001) but initially reduced completion of longer assessments. By the final year, assessment completion rates were above 89%, with intervention delivery reaching 42.8%. Implications for Public Health: Integrating behavioral health into a CHW-led program in rural communities was feasible and sustainable. High completion rates suggest that CHWs can effectively deliver behavioral health assessments and support in underserved settings, highlighting the value of flexible, community-informed implementation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coronel-Mockler et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=5,559). Integration of behavioral health components with targeted program adaptations vs. Initial program implementation prior to adaptations was evaluated on Completion of the behavioral health coaching intervention (OR 8.99, 95% CI 4.51-17.93, p=<.001). Program adaptations to a community health worker-led lifestyle intervention significantly improved the odds of participants completing behavioral health coaching by nearly 9-fold.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: