Key result
Resolution of systemic inflammation is linked to ~0.8 mL/kg/min greater peak VO2 improvement in HF.
Why the study?
Systemic inflammation is common in heart failure and its resolution is associated with better outcomes, but its relationship with cardiorespiratory fitness is unclear.
Does anakinra improve change in treadmill peak VO2 in patients with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=166)
Yes
Does anakinra improve change in treadmill peak VO2 in patients with heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.5% vs 0.7%
p-value: p=0.003
While resolution of systemic inflammation correlates with improved functional capacity in heart failure, lowering CRP with anakinra did not directly result in greater improvement in peak VO2.
Inflammation resolution may enhance exercise capacity in HF; leaves open whether anakinra improves outcomes in larger trials.
BACKGROUND Systemic inflammation, defined by C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥2 mg/L, is common in heart failure (HF) and its resolution is associated with better outcomes. We evaluated whether resolution of systemic inflammation was associated with improved peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) in patients with HF with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS Patients from five phase II clinical trials treated with anakinra, recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, or placebo, were pooled and stratified by CRP ≥ or <2.0 mg/L at longest follow-up. Change in treadmill peak VO 2 was the primary endpoint. Doppler echocardiography was also performed. RESULTS Among 166 patients (77% HFrEF, 23% HFpEF), baseline CRP was 6.1 (3.1 to 13.2) mg/L, and 47% had CRP <2 mg/L after 12 [6 to 24] weeks of treatment. Peak VO 2 improved more in those with inflammation resolution (+1.5 [+0.1 to +4.1] vs +0.7 [-0.8 to +1.9] mL·kg −1 ·min −1 , p =0.003). On-treatment CRP correlated with change in peak VO 2 (R=-0.26, p =0.0008), with every 1 mg/L difference in CRP corresponding to +0.1 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹. Anakinra treatment led to greater CRP reduction (-3.5 [-8.3 to -2.0] vs -0.6 [-3.7 to -0.8] mg/L; p <0.0001) and more frequently on-treatment CRP <2 mg/L (53% vs 33%, OR: 2.3 [95% CI 1.1-4.4]; p =0.03), although many patients failed to achieve resolution, and treatment was not associated with greater change in peak VO 2 . A sensitivity analysis showed an even greater improvement in peak VO 2 in those with on-treatment CRP <1 mg/L (+1.9 [+0.3 to +4.7] mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ). CONCLUSION Resolution of systemic inflammation was associated with a greater improvement in peak VO 2 in patients with HF. Anakinra decreased CRP levels, increasing inflammation resolution, but failed to achieve resolution in nearly half of the cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hogwood et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (HFrEF and HFpEF) (n=166). Resolution of systemic inflammation (CRP <2.0 mg/L) vs. Persistent systemic inflammation (CRP ≥2.0 mg/L) was evaluated on Change in treadmill peak VO2 (p=0.003). Resolution of systemic inflammation (CRP <2 mg/L) was associated with a greater improvement in peak VO2 compared to persistent inflammation (+1.5 vs +0.7 mL/kg/min; p=0.003) in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: