Why the study?
It is unclear whether the reported decline in sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy reflects fewer arrhythmic events or a greater proportion of deaths prevented by interventions.
Does the passage of time or increased ICD penetration improve the fraction of prevented arrhythmic events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Systematic Review (n=14,069)
Does the passage of time or increased ICD penetration improve the fraction of prevented arrhythmic events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 60.8% vs 27.7%
p-value: p=0.08
The shift from fatal to prevented arrhythmic events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy over the last two decades is driven by increased ICD therapy penetration, not temporal trends or improved out-of-hospital resuscitation.
Background: Contemporary series report declining sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but whether this reflects fewer arrhythmic events or a greater proportion of deaths successfully prevented is unclear. We examined the proportion of arrhythmic events that were prevented rather than fatal over two decades, and its determinants. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of observational HCM cohorts published in 2000–2024 reporting SCD, resuscitated cardiac arrest (RCA) and appropriate ICD discharge (ICD-d). The primary outcome, the prevented fraction, was (RCA + ICD-d)/(SCD + RCA + ICD-d). Proportions were pooled using random-effects models (Freeman–Tukey transformation), compared between periods (2000–2013 vs. 2014–2024) and examined by meta-regression. Results: Fourteen cohorts (14,069 patients; 712 arrhythmic events) were included. The prevented fraction was 53.2% (95% CI 36.0–70.1) overall, and higher in 2014–2024 than in 2000–2013, (60.8% vs. 27.7%; p = 0.08), although this comparison relied on only three cohorts in the first period. This variation was strongly associated with cohort ICD penetration (β = 0.022, p < 0.0001), which explained 72% of the between-study heterogeneity, whereas calendar year was not independently associated (p = 0.45 when adjusted for ICD penetration). SCD fell from 72.3% to 39.2% of events while appropriate discharges rose from 9.8% to 40.5%; the share prevented by resuscitation did not increase. SCD incidence fell from 0.69 to 0.27 per 100 patient-years, while appropriate discharges rose from 0.10 to 0.27; the yield per implanted device did not improve (16.7% vs. 12.9%) and devices per prevented event rose from 5.8 to 8.1. Conclusions: Arrhythmic events in HCM have shifted from predominantly fatal to predominantly prevented, driven by ICD therapy rather than by the passage of time or by improved out-of-hospital resuscitation, but at the cost of broader implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (n=14,069). Later time period (2014-2024) / ICD penetration vs. Earlier time period (2000-2013) was evaluated on Prevented fraction of arrhythmic events ((RCA + ICD-d)/(SCD + RCA + ICD-d)) (p=0.08).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: