Key result
Deep learning outperforms rule-based methods for paper ECG digitization across diverse layouts and noise.
Why the study?
A substantial number of ECG records remain only as paper or scanned images that degrade over time, causing information loss and limiting reuse in digital health applications.
Systematic Review (n=78)
Deep learning techniques offer robust solutions for digitizing legacy paper ECG records into machine-readable signals, facilitating historical data recovery and AI-driven health monitoring.
Enables rescue of legacy ECGs for digital health; extends heuristic methods but leaves open needs for benchmarks and validation.
Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of global mortality, and the electrocardiogram (ECG) is among the most widely used diagnostic tools. However, a substantial number of ECG records remain available only as paper records or scanned images, which are susceptible to aging, fading, and other forms of physical degradation, leading to information loss. Automatic paper ECG digitization, which involves reconstructing machine-readable waveforms from visual records, offers an effective means of transforming historical ECG records into reusable digital data. This systematic review synthesizes the evolution of automatic paper ECG digitization following the PRISMA framework and analyzes 78 studies. We first summarize public ECG databases and emerging image-based datasets and then examine the digitization pipeline across three stages: image preprocessing, waveform localization and extraction, and signal calibration and reconstruction. Both traditional computer vision techniques and deep learning methods are systematically compared, highlighting a shift from handcrafted rules toward data-driven feature learning that improves robustness to noise, waveform overlap, and heterogeneous layouts. We further review major applications, including historical data recovery, automated diagnosis, monitor calibration, and multimodal digital health integration. Key challenges are identified, notably the scarcity of paired image–signal datasets, the absence of standardized evaluation protocols, limited interpretability, and gaps in clinical validation. Future progress will depend on standardized benchmarks, lightweight and interpretable models, and multimodal and foundation-model approaches to enable robust, generalizable, and clinically applicable ECG digitization. By transforming legacy paper and image-based ECG records into machine-readable signals, ECG digitization can also serve as an enabling technology for multimodal physiological signal processing and artificial intelligence-driven health monitoring, contributing to the broader digital health ecosystem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biaosheng et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease / ECG records (n=78). Automatic paper ECG digitization was evaluated. A systematic review of 78 studies on automatic paper ECG digitization highlights a shift from handcrafted rules to deep learning methods, improving robustness to noise and heterogeneous layouts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: