Key result
Female sex is linked to significantly higher ischaemic heart disease case fatality across Eastern Europe.
Why the study?
Sex disparities in ischaemic heart disease outcomes are well documented in Western Europe but remain poorly characterized across Eastern Europe, a region with substantial mortality inequalities.
Does population-level case fatality among individuals living with ischaemic heart disease differ by sex in Eastern Europe?
Observational
Yes
Does population-level case fatality among individuals living with ischaemic heart disease differ by sex in Eastern Europe?
There are pronounced and persistent sex disparities in ischaemic heart disease case fatality across Eastern Europe, with women consistently facing a disadvantage associated with modifiable risk factors such as high fasting plasma glucose and systolic blood pressure.
May warrant intensified BP/glucose control in Eastern European women with IHD; leaves open causal impact on case fatality.
AIMS: Sex disparities in ischaemic heart disease (IHD) outcomes are well documented in Western Europe, but remain poorly characterized across Eastern Europe, a region marked by substantial mortality inequalities. We aimed to determine whether population-level case fatality among individuals living with IHD differed by sex in Eastern Europe and to identify modifiable risk factors associated with disparities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed sex-specific estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2023 study for seven Eastern European countries. Age-standardized IHD mortality and prevalence rates were combined to derive mortality-to-prevalence ratios (MPRs) as a measure of population-level case fatality. Risk factor-attributable mortality was similarly normalized to prevalence. Estonia, which had the lowest MPRs (men 3.00%; women 1.77%), served as the benchmark for Z-score analyses (|Z| ≥ 1.96 = P < 0.05). In 2011, women in 5 of 6 countries had higher MPRs than Estonian women (Z = 2.25-4.35), whereas men showed excess MPRs in only 3 countries (Z = 2.29-3.18). By 2023, all 6 countries showed higher female MPRs than Estonia (Z = 3.27-5.14). In men, excess MPRs persisted in Latvia, the Russian Federation and Ukraine (Z = 2.48-3.16) and emerged in Belarus (Z = 4.79) but remained non-significant in Lithuania and the Republic of Moldova.Female-specific benchmark signals were observed for high fasting plasma glucose in Belarus and the Republic of Moldova, and for high systolic blood pressure in Lithuania, the Republic of Moldova, and the Russian Federation. CONCLUSIONS: Pronounced sex disparities in IHD population-level case fatality persist across Eastern Europe. Lithuania and the Republic of Moldova showed the most consistent female disadvantage. Excess female population-level case fatality was most consistently associated with key modifiable risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bugiardini et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Ischaemic heart disease. Female sex vs. Male sex and regional benchmark (Estonia) was evaluated on Mortality-to-prevalence ratios (MPRs) as a measure of population-level case fatality. Pronounced sex disparities in ischaemic heart disease case fatality persist across Eastern Europe, with women showing significantly higher mortality-to-prevalence ratios than the benchmark (Z=3.27-5.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: