Key result
Medication adherence following myocardial infarction remains suboptimal, with statin adherence reported at <60% and yearly LDL cholesterol measurement performed in <30% of patients.
This editorial highlights the critical issue of suboptimal medication adherence and delayed risk factor assessment in secondary prevention post-myocardial infarction.
This editorial refers to ‘Predictive modelling of medication adherence in post-myocardial infarction patients: a Bayesian approach using beta-regression’, by E.E. Tannous et al., https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae327. The management of medication adherence in patients recovering from myocardial infarction (MI) remains a cornerstone of secondary prevention. Medication adherence is often suboptimal, even in after acute serious non-fatal cardiovascular events, and is known to progressively decline during the year following index event. At mid-term follow-up, a Swedish real-world cohort study1 reported <60% of adherence to statin following acute coronary syndrome. Beyond adherence, assessment of risk factors is often delayed. The recommended yearly measurement of LDL cholesterol is only performed in <30% of patients,2 resulting in an obvious suboptimal management, impaired outcome, and increased healthcare costs. The determinants of poor adherence are complex and may markedly vary according to age, social group, countries, and healthcare system or underlying disease. However, it seems associated with older age, adverse social determinants (i.e. unfavourable educational, social, economic, or environmental conditions), and habits and behaviour rather than cognitive status.3,4
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magné et al. (2025) conducted an editorial in myocardial infarction. Medication adherence was evaluated. Medication adherence following myocardial infarction remains suboptimal, with statin adherence reported at <60% and yearly LDL cholesterol measurement performed in <30% of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: