Key result
Endoscopic drainage successfully resolves life-threatening gastropericardial fistula after failed surgical access.
Why the study?
Gastropericardial fistula caused by gastric conduit ulcer after esophagectomy is extremely rare and often fatal, with unclear optimal management when surgery is difficult.
Case Report (n=1)
Endoscopic drainage may serve as a viable rescue option for severe purulent pericarditis secondary to gastropericardial fistulas when conventional surgical approaches are technically difficult.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pericardial penetration by gastric conduit ulcer warrants urgent recognition in shocked post-esophagectomy patients; leaves open optimal non-surgical strategies.
Gastric conduit ulcer is a postoperative complication of esophagectomy. However, penetration into the pericardium is extremely rare and often fatal. Although surgical drainage is standard treatment, optimal management when surgery is difficult remains unclear. A 60-year-old man in shock was transferred to our hospital 2 years after mediastinoscopic esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal cancer. Computed tomography revealed air and fluid in the pericardial cavity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a perforated gastric conduit ulcer. The patient was diagnosed with mediastinitis and purulent pericarditis. Emergency laparoscopic transhiatal exploration and placement of a chest tube in the left pleural cavity were performed; however, dense adhesions prevented access to the perforation site and pericardial cavity. Because direct pericardial drainage could not be achieved, endoscopic drainage was performed, resulting in rapid improvement of inflammatory findings and a favorable outcome. Few cases of pericardial penetration caused by gastric conduit ulcers have been reported, all showing a rapidly progressive course. Therefore, this condition should be considered an acute, life-threatening event requiring prompt management. Adjunctive endoscopic drainage may serve as a complementary rescue option in selected patients when conventional surgical or percutaneous access to the pericardial cavity is technically difficult or fails to achieve direct drainage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamagishi et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Gastropericardial fistula caused by a gastric conduit ulcer (n=1). Endoscopic drainage was evaluated on Improvement of inflammatory findings and clinical outcome. Endoscopic drainage successfully resolved a life-threatening gastropericardial fistula in 1 patient (a 60-year-old man) after conventional surgical access to the pericardial cavity failed.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: