Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To identify the evolution of tipping points in pacing strategies between medalists (MED) and nonmedalists (NON-MED) in 10-km events of the Olympic Games (OG) and World Aquatics Championships (WC). Additionally, we characterized the temporal trends of dual participation (pool and open-water) to provide a necessary contextual framework for these competitive shifts. METHODS: Involving data from 1066 individual performances, 1-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was applied to identify relevant tipping points in swimming velocity (v) between MED and NON-MED. Dual participation rates from 4 OG (2012-2024) and 7 WC (2013-2025) editions were evaluated using quadratic regression models. RESULTS: Males MED progressively maintained higher v throughout races at the OG (2024: 1.47 m·s-1 for MED vs 1.41 m·s-1 for NON-MED) and WC (2025: 1.48 m·s-1 for MED vs 1.43 m·s-1 for NON-MED), reflecting an evolution toward sustained pacing. In women, pacing differences at the OG remained fragmented (2024: 1.31 vs 1.25 m·s-1), whereas WC data showed increasingly earlier and stronger dominance, culminating in full-race separation in 2025 (1.38 vs 1.33 m·s-1). Dual participation peaked at the 2024 OG for men (32.0%) and women (16.7%), but exhibited fluctuations and a recent decline at the WC (eg, 2025: men 5.2%, women 7.5%). CONCLUSION: Pacing strategies in elite marathon swimming have evolved, with v tipping points between MED and NON-MED shifting toward an earlier and more aggressive separation. Contextually, despite fluctuating dual-participation trends, developing physiological and tactical capacities to sustain elevated v from early stages is increasingly essential for consistent performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zacca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: