Digital Product Passports (DPPs) are gradually being made mandatory under the European Union’s Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) . Whether they succeed in promoting sustainable consumption will depend on how well consumers engage with the information they provide . To date, regulatory and supply chain perspectives on DPPs have been widely researched . However, the emerging literature on DPPs from a consumer perspective remains fragmented with a predominantly single-country focus and few studies delivering insights into the psychological drivers of consumer acceptance of DPPs from a holistic perspective . This paper seeks to investigate drivers of consumer intention to use DPPs using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model . The model is extended to include Subjective Knowledge and Trust . An online cross-sectional consumer survey of 1488 respondents across four European markets (Denmark, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland) was analysed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling . Results show that DPPs are poorly known (22 . 4% of respondents were aware of them) but positively evaluative in most other dimensions . The Extended TAM explains a variance of 76% (R 2 = 0 . 76) in Intention to Use . Trust has the strongest direct effect on Perceived Ease of Use ( β = 0 . 66) . Trust also has an important effect on Usefulness . Subjective Knowledge has an effect on Usefulness through Trust . Perceived Usefulness has the strongest direct effect on Intention to Use . We posit that there is a sequence to information circulated, with awareness and credibility signals preceding usefulness . The paper provides cross-national evidence on DPP acceptance and finds Trust as an important adoption mechanism, broadening technology-acceptance theory and providing practical guidance for policymakers and firms on the sequencing of awareness, credibility and usefulness messaging within the framework of DPPs transitioning to mandatory implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chrysochou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: