Key result
AI-ECG embeddings improve submaximal VO2max prediction by an absolute ~8% over clinical factors alone.
Why the study?
Resting ECGs have potential to estimate physiological metrics including cardiorespiratory fitness, but current deep learning models struggle with cross-cohort transferability or require active exercise data.
Does adding deep learning representations of resting ECGs improve the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness and physiological metrics beyond basic clinical characteristics?
Observational (n=84,125)
Does adding deep learning representations of resting ECGs improve the estimation of cardiorespiratory fitness and physiological metrics beyond basic clinical characteristics?
Effect estimate: Δ R2 of 8% (Full model R2 0.57 vs Basic model R2 0.49)
Deep learning analysis of routinely acquired resting 12-lead ECGs can extract incremental physiological information to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition beyond standard demographics.
May refine noninvasive VO2max estimation from routine ECGs; leaves open prospective clinical utility and requires validation.
Maximal oxygen consumption is the gold standard for cardiorespiratory fitness but requires resource-intensive physical testing. Recent reports show that machine learning models can extract additional information from ECGs, yet the potential of ECG as a source of physiological metrics remains underutilized. While routinely collected resting electrocardiograms (ECG) provide an opportunistic window into cardiorespiratory fitness, current deep learning models often struggle with cross-cohort transferability or remain dependent on active exercise data. We developed population specific models using the UK Biobank to estimate submaximal exercise derived ( N = 8,540) and a panel of other physiological metrics (sample sizes up to N = 78,265) from resting 12-lead ECGs using Patient Contrastive Learning of Representations (PCLR), an AI based tool that converts ECG into a set of 320 features (ECG-PCLR). Data were split 80%:20% (training:test) and models were evaluated on a set-aside test subset. We demonstrate that ECG-PCLR embeddings alone can estimate submaximal and body fat percentage with Pearson correlations ( r ) of 0.61 and 0.65, respectively. They also estimate systolic blood pressure, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and grip strength with r values from 0.31 to 0.55. Adding ECG embeddings to basic predictors (age, sex and BMI) improves submaximal prediction by an absolute Δ R 2 of 8% and by 1% to 13% for other physiologic parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mankowski et al. (2026) conducted an observational in General population (n=84,125). Resting 12-lead ECG deep learning embeddings (ECG-PCLR) vs. Basic clinical predictors (age, sex, and BMI) was evaluated on Estimation of submaximal exercise derived VO2max (Δ R2 of 8% (Full model R2 0.57 vs Basic model R2 0.49)). Adding deep learning-derived ECG embeddings to basic predictors (age, sex, BMI) improved the estimation of submaximal exercise derived VO2max by an absolute Δ R2 of 8%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: