This article examines environmental injustice and waste economies in post-socialist Eastern Europe through case studies of Câmpulung and Băicoi, Romania. Drawing on environmental justice, anthropology, post-socialist studies, and 44 semi-structured interviews, we analyze how toxic waste accumulation, weak regulation, post-industrial decline, global waste flows, and class dynamics intersect. We develop the concept of the “double communality of waste.” First, we argue that waste functions as a “negative commons,” as its harmful effects are collectively shared despite fragmented responsibility. Second, we argue that post-socialist transformations have “wasted” former industrial and social commons through privatization, deindustrialization, and the erosion of collective infrastructures and values. Our analysis makes three key observations. First , waste invites waste: initial dumping, enabled by weak governance and uneven development, generates self-reinforcing cycles attracting further accumulation and integration into transnational waste networks. In short, where there is waste—where public infrastructure, nature, or human lives are “wasted”—more waste is created. Second , repeated cycles of contamination and limited resistance normalize environmental harm, rendering waste an ordinary condition of everyday life. Third , we conceptualize these dynamics as “transversal toxicity,” where material pollution converges with neglect, corruption, anticommunist discourses, and an economy reproducing dependency and inequality: the dumping of toxic materials is enabled by “toxic” corruption and political carelessness, unnuanced anticommunism and the indictment of any retrospective gaze, ultimately encouraged by a “toxic” economic model that lays waste to human lives and formerly thriving industrial communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olaru et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: