This work develops lightweight, sustainable PP/rPP/biocarbon composites targeting automotive applications. Virgin PP was blended with automotive recycled PP (rPP) at 70/30 and 50/50 ratios; the 50PP/50rPP blend exhibited the highest impact strength (31.54 J/m) with acceptable stiffness and was selected as the composite matrix. Incorporation of 24 wt% waste paper/plastic‐derived biocarbon (BC) and 3 wt% PP‐g‐MA (MAPP) into the 50/50 blend increased tensile and flexural moduli by 36% and 33%, while maintaining density below 1.0 g/cm 3 (0.977 g/cm 3 ), thus maintaining a favorable stiffness‐to‐weight ratio. Thermal stability was significantly improved: T 10 increased by 33°C in the compatibilized BC composite compared to the 50PP/50rPP blend, and HDT increased by 44%. Biocarbon acted as a nucleating agent, increasing crystallinity by 47% in the uncompatibilized composite. The Guth‐Smallwood model predicted a nearly two‐fold increase in tensile and flexural moduli at a BC volume fraction of 0.19; experimentally, the BC composites reached ~67%–82% of this theoretical upper bound, indicating effective but non‐ideal reinforcement due to residual agglomeration and interfacial defects. The PP/rPP/BC system demonstrates low‐density, high stiffness, thermally stable composites suitable for automotive components such as dashboards while valorizing waste streams and reducing dependence on virgin fossil‐based polymers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edayath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: