This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Leaning-type arch bridges are attractive for wide-deck urban applications, but their elastic global buckling mechanisms and parameter sensitivities remain insufficiently quantified. This study investigates a leaning-type steel box arch bridge using a three-dimensional finite element model validated against field-measured arch deflections and hanger forces. Linear elastic eigenvalue buckling analyses examine the structural system, rise-to-span ratio, arch stiffness, leaning-arch inclining angle, and transverse-bracing characteristics, together with the coupled effect of rise-to-span ratio and main-arch stiffness. Within the investigated bridge configuration, the integrated leaning-arch–transverse-bracing system increases the stability coefficient by approximately 71% relative to the unbraced main-arch system. A relatively favorable main-arch rise-to-span ratio of approximately 1/7–1/4.5 is identified. Main-arch bending stiffness has a pronounced influence, and its quantitative effect depends on the rise-to-span ratio. Variations in leaning-arch inclining angle produce relatively limited net changes, while further increases in bracing stiffness yield diminishing improvements. For a fixed bracing quantity, balanced spatial distribution over the arch span is more effective than concentrating bracings within a limited region. These findings provide a quantitative basis for comparative stability assessment and preliminary design of similar bridge systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
She et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: