This study evaluates flood risk perception and communication in five informal settlements in Brazil, three in Curitiba and two in Recife, characterized by recurrent flooding and socio-environmental vulnerability. A structured questionnaire was applied to 1,405 residents, and data were analysed using non-parametric tests, correlation analysis, and linear regression models. Indicators were normalized to a 0–1 scale, where higher values indicate greater perception or communication. Results show moderate levels of risk perception (0.48) and communication (0.43), with significant differences across communities (p < 0.001). Risk perception increased with age (β = 0.011, p < 0.001) and proximity to rivers (β = −0.022, p < 0.001), while households with vulnerable groups showed lower coping capacity (β = −0.017, p = 0.001). Despite high trust in authorities (0.65), preparedness remained low (0.27). Findings highlight persistent communication gaps and the need for community-based, context-sensitive risk communication strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fonseca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: