This study analyzes how Interactive Groups (IGs) have been implemented in 62 schools participating in the Learning Communities project that apply this Successful Educational Action. Specifically, it examines the training received by teachers, the educational stages and subject areas in which IGs are implemented, their purpose, frequency of implementation, and the profiles of participating volunteers. Data were collected through semi-structured, communicative interviews with members of the school leadership team and/or the project coordinator at each school. The results show that while initial teacher training is brief, a high proportion of schools actively seek additional specialized training. IGs are implemented primarily on a weekly basis, with a clear emphasis on instrumental subjects. While informants report that IGs are currently used mainly to reinforce prior learning and promote cooperation, the broader pedagogical potential of dialogic learning is also acknowledged. The findings also highlight the need to increase the number of volunteers involved. The study concludes that there is a need to expand teacher training in this methodology and to implement more effective strategies for volunteer recruitment. It also suggests increasing the frequency of implementation to consolidate IGs as a transformative tool for instrumental learning through dialogue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domínguez-Rodríguez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: